Under which condition may a blood sample be forcibly taken from a suspect?

The correct answer is based on the legal and procedural guidelines surrounding the collection of blood samples in situations involving suspected intoxication. Forcibly taking a blood sample is typically justified if an officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the suspect is intoxicated and that obtaining that sample is crucial for establishing impairment or violation of the law.

In many jurisdictions, laws are in place to ensure that an individual's right to refuse a blood sample is weighed against public safety concerns, particularly in cases involving driving under the influence. If an officer has already discerned signs of intoxication, the necessity of obtaining the sample for evidentiary purposes can override the individual’s initial right to refuse, especially when public safety is at stake.

Other conditions listed provide different contexts but don’t carry the same legal weight in justifying a forced blood draw. For instance, simply being uncooperative or non-resident does not inherently mean that a sample should be taken without consent, as rights still vary based on legal considerations and procedures specific to each state. The act of refusing a test, while relevant, does not independently empower an officer to take a blood sample by force without the underpinning belief that the suspect is intoxicated.